Why does proactive engineering require product standardisation?

If you are responsible for a product manufacturing company, then it is essential that your engineering team take a proactive approach to product design and standardisation. Proactive Engineering allows engineers to plan ahead and not be driven by production deadlines. A reactive engineering team that does not embrace product standardisation can lead to:

  • High engineering costs
  • Bottlenecks
  • Poor customer service
  • Unreliable profitability
  • Late deliveries
  • Low esteem within engineering

Product standardisation

The ability to configure standard products without additional assistance from engineering is paramount in today’s competitive market. Engineering’s responsibility to fully define products is clear. Include all configurations, features and options that are necessary to the product range and make sure this work before arriving at the point of sale providing a reliable source of information for the company.

Wikipedia defines “Standardisation is the process of implementing and developing technical standards based on the consensus of different parties that include firms, users, interest groups, standards organizations and governments. Standardization can help to maximize compatibility, interoperability, safety, repeatability, or quality.”

These are some ill-founded excuses provided by management as to why product standardisation cannot be achieved;

Is the product too complex to standardise?

It can be argued that the more complex a product is, the greater is the justification to standardise as there is more to gain. Unless the company designs and manufactures completely bespoke and unrelated products there will always be opportunities to standardise the design. Follow well defined principles to ensure product standardisation does not become a complex process.

There are too many variables?

Variables can be easily managed with parametrically driven dimensions, and it is essential to know how to apply engineering rules and how these rules affect the behaviour of the product.

Does standardisation reduce features and options?

Standardisation can, but does not need to reduce features or options. A principal goal of standardisation is to do more with less. It is prudent to evaluate  features and options carefully if these are to be included. Frequently additional features and options will be added. A principal goal of standardisation is for the standard to provide a 95% fit. It is important to consider the commercial benefit of features or options which may be rarely used.

Are there insufficient resources?

Moreover, standardisation will save significantly more time than the time invested. Apart from the direct savings made in engineering, there will be fewer errors, shorter delivery times and increased customer satisfaction. Increased product development empowers engineers. Bring in outside resources to supplement the in-house team if engineering resources are unavailable.

Product standardisation is the starting point for many other initiatives that can transform a business and lead to proactive engineering. This provides a framework which allows the attachment of accurate costs. This leads to a better control of margins. Better more consistent information improves quality and leads to lower rework with fewer demands on management. Sales and product configurators become possible which can automate product selection, quote generation and downstream processes.

In today’s competitive world, the use of product standardisation is no longer an option, it is essential for any manufacturing business that has not fully embraced it. Future articles will focus on how to go about product standardisation.



Written by Peter Slee-Smith, Edited by Jason Spencer – 19/04/2018

Gatehouse Design offers services around product configuration, along with other design services.

If you want to learn more about the authors of this article you can find our LinkedIn profiles here.

If you have any ideas or questions, please feel free to contact us.

Leave a Reply